This post is a little bit retro, so bear with me. In the Suzuki-guitar Facebook group, a teacher asked for suggestions to give to a parent whose child has a hard time learning the song names in Book 1.

This was hard for me and M, and I came up with a unique solution that I thought I’d share. For each song, I figured out some singable, distinctive piece of the melody, then I recorded very short snippets of myself singing the song’s name to that melody. Next, I burned a custom audio CD of the Book 1 songs featuring my singing before each song. Thus, for instance, before the actual Song of the Wind, you would hear me singing, ‘Ba-da-ba-ba, Ba-da-ba-ba, So-ong of the Wind.”

Some disclaimers:

  • I sang the name of “Rigadoon” as “Rigadon” (i.e., “on” not “oon”) because the CD jacket or the book (I forget which) has it spelled that way. But I later learned that everyone says “Rigadoon.”
  • Ideally, the volume on these should be a hair lower to balance better with the songs. But we lived with it. You could reduce the volume yourself in an audio editor like Audacity.
  • I recorded the singing in Audacity with a crummy headset mike, and I’m not the world’s best singer, so these song intros are not high art. But I can keep a tune, and after hearing these intros many times, everyone in the family (including my wife, who is not the Suzuki parent) knows the names of the Book 1 songs.

I’ve put the audio files below in a browser-based player. To listen to or download an individual file:

  1. Click a song’s name in the playlist.
  2. The song will load in the player and will soon start playing. You should see the words “Download MP3″ under the song name.
  3. Right-click “Download MP3″ and save the file to your computer.
Alternatively, you can download this ZIP file (3.7 MB) that contains all of them:

The Suzuki Association of America has just posted a very nice 11-minute video titled The Sound of Success: Suzuki Method for Guitar. It’s a general overview, aimed at potential students and teachers. It includes brief interviews with some of the country’s best-known Suzuki-guitar teachers (Mary Lou Roberts; David Madsen, who put the video together; Andrea Cannon; Bill Kossler; and others).

Portions of the video were shot at the Suzuki Association’s national convention in 2010. At the time, the producers actually took some video of M for potential use in the video. I think she played Lightly Row. She was about 5 at the time, and had been playing for about six months. Alas, her scene was left on the cutting-room floor (for you youngsters who don’t know what film is, that means “her scene isn’t in the final video”).

But it’s a nice video, even without her.

[I'm just diving back in here. I can't make any pretense of keeping up any more. But I'm not going to let my desire for perfection—i.e., regular posting—get in the way of achievement—i.e., some posting. A good Suzuki-style approach!]

Here’s my latest approach to conflict or defiance from M in our home practices: As soon as I see any defiance or hostility, and well before I’ve started to get mad, I ask M to take a break and return when she’s ready. The nice thing about this approach is that it spares both me and M the unpleasantness of my anger. And because I am calm, asking her to take a break doesn’t sound like punishment; it’s just asking her to take a break.

A little over two weeks ago (on Monday, March 12), I asked M to take a break just a few minutes after we got started, because she was acting hostile and uncooperative. She walked into the next room and started wailing. I said that she could come back when she was calm, then I picked up a book and started reading.

A few minutes later, she stormed over with a drawing in her hand. She proceeded to give me one drawing after another. Below, I describe the drawings and narrate the associated goings-on. First, though, here’s a gallery of the drawings (click to view full size; when viewing full size, you can click links for “next image” or “previous image” to scroll through the series):

Drawing 1: My angry big head, her tiny head, and the words: “Now ya happy? Hmmph. Why don’t you change the subject?”

When she hands me this drawing, I look at it; look at her; smile a little; and say nothing. I keep reading. I continue to accept the drawings silently until she gives me the sixth drawing.

Drawing 2: No pictures now, just words: “You’re mean (always) never nice or kind. Hmmph. Now ya happy?”

I have no idea where “Now ya happy” is coming from.

Drawing 3: “Ya I know, no dessert. I don’t care. So ha.”

Now, I should make something clear: I don’t directly use dessert (or its lack) as a reward (or a punishment). But we eat dessert (if we eat it) after practice and before bedtime, and practice is over when we’ve done what I’ve set out to do, not after any set time period. So if practice runs long because of a tantrum, then we simply don’t have time for dessert, because we will practice until bedtime if necessary.

Drawing 4:  “Read! Never!”

M is clearly getting madder. But at the time she hands me this, I don’t understand what she means by it.

Drawing 5: “Your breath stinks.”

Probably true.

Drawing 6: “Stop it now!”

At this point, I speak, asking, “Honey, I don’t know what you want me to stop doing. I’m just waiting for you to be ready. I don’t understand what you want.”

Drawing 7: “What you’re doing. Don’t you know that? Oh yeah, I know the answer: NO.”

Again, I speak: “You’re right, I don’t know what you want me to stop doing. I’m sorry, I just don’t understand. I’m just waiting for you.”

Drawing 8: “Once you stop reading I’ll come back.”

Aha! Now I get it. Psychologically, what she’s doing here makes sense: She’s trying to regain a sense of control by being the one who sets the conditions of her return, and by getting me to change my behavior before she does. Astute, but no dice: I explain that I will stop reading when she comes back, but I’m not going to stop first. If she wants me to stop reading, she simply has to return to practice. But I’m not going to stop earlier just to get her to come back.

Drawing 8: “Okay Mr. Glasses, you are coo coo.”

M has depicted herself with a crazy head (big eyes, tongue out, spiky hair), spinning her fingers at her ears in the sign for “crazy,” saying “Coo coo, coo coo.”

M is clearly starting to settle down; she can now joke about our situation, instead of being caught up in rage. I think that my talking to her calmly in response to the previous drawings comforted her.

Still, she doesn’t return. Instead, she walks into the next room and back to her drawing pad. As she’s standing there, she lets out a series of very loud farts.

I respond: “You’re improvising.” (M regularly improvises over a chord progression as part of our practices.) She chuckles. She returns with:

Drawing 10: “Snort snort snort. Sorry?”

M has depicted herself with tears on her face and gas coming from her behind, including a heart-shaped cloud of flatulence. The gas is all heading toward a small toilet. Meanwhile, I’m at the bottom holding my nose.

She handed me this last drawing; I admired it; we hugged; and then we had a perfectly pleasant and productive 45-minute practice.

This post has little to do with Suzuki guitar. Okay, nothing to do with Suzuki guitar. But this is my blog; I’m pissed at Hertz; so I’m blogging about it here.

On Friday March 16, I made arrangements to travel to LA the next day to visit a dying friend. My hotel (a Radisson) referred me to Hertz for a “deal” on car rental. I already had an offer from Alamo, but I figured I’d give Hertz a shot.

On the phone, Hertz quotes me $330 for a week’s rental. I say it’s too high because Alamo quoted me $270. The Hertz rep asks me if I have any major credit cards that might get me a discount. I propose two, a USAA card and a Chase card. She checks. The USAA discount would get me to $260, and the Chase discount is even better: $230 and change. “Great,” I say, “book it.” The agent takes all my info, tells me I’m all set, and gives me a confirmation number.

As she gave me the confirmation number, I specifically thought to myself, “Should I write this down? Nah, there’s really no need. They’ve got my name in the system.”

So I arrive at LAX Friday night and get to the Hertz counter at 11 pm. I give my name.

Agent: “Sorry, we don’t have a reservation for you. Do you have a confirmation number? No? Well, the best rate I’m showing is $430 [or thereabouts].”

Me: “Whoa, that’s way too high. Let me talk to the manager.”

Hertz: “Okay, but it’s spring break. We can’t just give you the lower rate without some proof it was quoted to you.”

The manager comes out. He wants a confirmation number. I wake up my wife and ask her to look on my desk in case I wrote it down on my page with travel notes, but I didn’t. The manager and his agent see me do this and hear me talking to her.

So I tell my story again, and I’m visibly distraught: I’m visiting a dying friend; I made a reservation on the phone by referral from Radisson; I was quoted $330, then $260, then $230. I ask: “Why would I make this up? You want proof that I got the quote — your proof is that I’m standing here at the Hertz counter telling you this story. Why would I show up here?”

Manager: “Do you know the name of the person you spoke with?”

Me: “No. I saw no reason to ask her name. You are telling me you can’t help me because you don’t believe me?”

Manager: “We can get you a car, sir.”

Me: “I know you can get me a car. But I expect a car at the rate I was quoted, $230.”

Manager: “We can’t do that.”

Muttering obscenities, I ask for my ID and credit-card back and leave Hertz. I ask the Hertz shuttle guy to take me back to the airport because I am going to use a different rental-car company. He offers to drop me at Avis or Budget, which are on the way back to the airport. (This is the only thoughtful thing a Hertz employee did for me.)

He drops me at Avis. I tell my story. They give me a car for $260. (I think they should have done better on the price, but the person I dealt with was totally courteous, and I needed a damn car.)

So Hertz, if you’re listening:

You suck. You treated me like crap, and you showed yourselves to be utter morons. Even if your counter people genuinely thought I was lying—which only a moron would think (why, why, why do you think a person would show up at your counter at 11 pm and invent a story—and cry—and wake his wife up—just to get a lower rate on a car—a rate that is in spitting distance of your competitor’s advertised rates?)—a sane manager would have just given me what I wanted to avoid the possibility that I was telling the truth and would publicize your horridness on social media. Which I am doing now.

Hertz is the world’s worst car-rental company.

A parent admired my daughter’s stool at this weekend’s Suzuki Association of Minnesota graduation event, so I’ve updated my gear page by adding more info about chairs and stools. I also added some more info about tuners. Check it out!

(And yes, I know the blog has seemed moribund. But do not despair! I plan to return to regular posting soon.)

Lately, M’s studio teacher has been emphasizing things other than the Suzuki repertoire. M has a total of four multi-part non-Suzuki songs she’s working on, two for her group class and two for a quartet she’s in (but that has only met twice so far, because it’s not officially on the schedule). In addition, M’s teacher is encouraging all of her students to work on improvising on the A-minor scale, which she has now taught in three forms: as the ordinary A-minor scale in 1st position; as the A-minor pentatonic scale in 5th position; and as part of the C-major scale that starts in 1st position and moves up to 5th position.

I was already feeling pressed to keep up with M’s Suzuki repertoire (review and working). But I decided after this Saturday’s studio lesson — in which M was assigned the C-major scale — that I would go with the flow and cut back the amount of Suzuki material we were working on. M is doing pretty well on it, and she enjoys all of the other stuff, so I thought I’d mostly give most of the repertoire a rest this week.

Then on Sunday, when reading Practiceopedia to M, we got to a section about “one-way doors” — a practice technique in which you decide that you will not allow yourself to practice a piece for an extended period after a certain day. This is supposed to concentrate the mind.

I don’t think M is ready for any one-way doors, but something in the section leapt out at me: The author said that if you find that you cannot play a piece when you return to it, you closed the door to soon, and you did not have a clear enough idea of the piece in the first place.

So I thought: That’s what we’ll do with the repertoire this week. We’ll just pick one song at a time and make sure that M has a clear idea of the song. After we establish a crystal-clear idea of that piece in M’s head, we’ll move on. “That shouldn’t take too much practice time each day,” I thought. Famous last words.

On Sunday, because I wanted M to succeed with a repertoire piece, I asked her to pick a relatively recent one that she felt pretty confident about. She chose A Toye.

She botched the form. Again. And again. So then I asked her to sing it. She would get it right once, then wrong twice, then right once, then wrong twice. Etc.

So this week, I have been asking her to sing it over and over again, to try to get her in the habit of listening to what she is doing and anticipating what come’s next.

It has not been pretty. She hasn’t gotten it right more than three or four times in a row, and she probably gets it wrong more than she gets it right. She’s gotten so upset during practices that she has actually kicked me — gently, but still, totally unacceptable. I have gotten so angry with her refusal to do what I tell her that I have yelled at her and, on Valentine’s Day, eaten her candy. And we have had more marathon sessions consisting mostly of singing. And I’ve been insisting that she sing A Toye in the car.

As I said in my last post, I just do not know what to do differently. It’s not a memorization issue — she can recite the form of the song, and she knows when she gets it wrong. It’s an attention issue: she sings along on autopilot, and she is not thinking about what is coming next. Often she’ll finish a section, then sing the first note of the wrong section, then stop and start crying because she got it wrong. Then she’ll get angry and sing the whole song angrily, but correctly. Then she’ll get it wrong again. Somehow she just will not consistently monitor her own performance, think about what should be coming next, and deliver it.

Of course, it’s not all doom and gloom. She is still doing well on her non-Suzuki music, and she enjoys improvising. She also did a fantastic job this evening in a school music show in which she played the drums (alternating single hits on the snare drum and cymbal) while her classmates sang. She hadn’t even told me she was going to be playing the drums or had been practicing at school! She kept a very steady beat, which is the result of all the metronome practice we do.

But I am going a little bit nuts over here, trying to get M to listen to herself and think ahead.

Anyone who reads this blog knows that my posts have gotten less frequent. This partly reflects my personality (I prefer novelty to routine), but it also reflects the fact that M’s practices have gotten a lot better in the last several weeks. In fact, we’ve had enough good days now that I can say with some confidence that M has basically bought in to the whole idea of practicing the guitar.

Indeed, in the past few weeks, she has done two things that suggest that she is finally on board with the guitar program. First, one morning before breakfast, she spontaneously picked up her guitar and started playing a song for group class that was on her music stand from the night before. Second, when I gave her her guitar before group class last Saturday, she started playing her working piece. She has never done this before.

And it only took more than two years of conflict and misery to get here!

Because misery is inherently more dramatic than happiness, I’ve been less inclined to write about practice. Also, I got absorbed for a few weeks in a home-remodeling project (I had to rebuild my basement stairs), and since I’m not very good at multi-tasking, blogging went by the wayside. I’m back now, though, and will try to post more regularly.

In terms of the Suzuki repertoire, M is now working on Paganini’s Andante (the fifth song in book 2). She has learned the notes pretty quickly, and she can now play most of the song. Her studio teacher even decided to make it a little extra-challenging by adding grace notes (a hammer-on/pull-off) in one section.

M’s biggest challenge remains playing songs that she knows with the correct form. We’ve had two really awful practices in the past few weeks where she simply failed to pay attention to what she was playing and botched a song’s form over and over.

The first awful practice was about two weeks ago, on a Friday. I asked M to play A Toye, a song she knows pretty well. She played the form wrong. I pointed it out (she hadn’t noticed). I asked her to try again; she got it wrong again. After a few such repetitions, I said something like:

Honey, I don’t know how to help you with this. The problem is that you are not listening to what you are playing until after your fingers start moving, so instead of being in charge of what you are playing, you’re just going on autopilot. To fix this, you have to change how you use your mind. And I can’t do that for you. I can’t get inside of your head. Only you can change your thinking. So I’m going to go in the other room for a while, and I want you to see if you can figure out how to use your mind to make sure that you are playing the song correctly. You know that you can play the song; you’ve done so many times. No part of this song is hard for you. But you have to pay attention to what you are doing. Let me know when you think you have figured out how to play it. I think you should focus on hearing the song in your head, listening to your playing, and watching what you are doing. But you need to figure it out. Let me know when you are confident that you can play the song with the right form.

I went into the kitchen for five or ten minutes, and M struggled with the song. Then she told me she was ready and asked me to come back.

She botched the form, and she started wailing. I tried to be sympathetic but firm. I said that I could understand why she was upset, but I still insisted that she play the song with the proper form. I made some suggestions, such as listening to it again, but she rejected them. I again said that I didn’t know how to help her, and she was going to have to figure out how to pay attention to what she was doing. I offered to sit in the room with her if that would be helpful. She accepted the offer.

I sat there, more or less without talking, while she kept trying, and mostly failing, to play the song with the correct form. She would play a part correctly, then play the wrong part, and a few notes in (when she realized her mistake), she would start wailing again.

This went on, from start to finish, for an hour and a half to two hours. Eventually, she did manage to play it with the proper form and only a few missed notes, and I could tell that she was really paying attention to her playing. I congratulated her. I pointed out that I could tell from watching her she was listening to and paying attention to her playing. I said that I knew she could do it.

And if you had asked me before yesterday about the effect of that marathon practice, I would have told you that it seemed to mark a turning point: For about two weeks after that practice, she was consistently playing her newish pieces (A Toye and Carcassi’s Andante) with the proper form with far more accuracy and regularity than she had shown previously. Now, I would have admitted that the timing may have been a coincidence — for all I know, she was just ready to start concentrating better, and the practice had no effect on her level of concentration. But the timing was undeniable: immediately after that practice, she seemed to be paying much better attention to her playing.

Yesterday, however, we had another terrible practice in which M, once again, went on autopilot, botched a song’s form, and broke down in tears each time she realized (too late) that she was doing it. This time, the song was different — her problems were with Carcassi’s Andante, not with A Toye.

She has been playing Carcassi’s Andante with the correct form regularly for weeks, so it was a surprise to me when she got it wrong yesterday. In fact, I picked the song for our practice because I wanted to give her something easy to do (she has dance class on Tuesday, so we can only do a short practice). But our practice, which ended up lasting about 40 minutes (20 minutes more than I planned), was basically a repeat of the practice with A Toye a few weeks ago, complete with wailing and gnashing of teeth: she got the form wrong over and over again. I tried a few things to help her out: I set a metronome much slower than she was trying to play it, but the extra time created by the slow tempo didn’t help her. Then I turned the metronome off and told her to take all the time she wanted, without worrying about the steady beat, so she could make sure she was playing the right sections. That didn’t help either. Her mind was consistently behind her hands, no matter how slowly she was playing.

We had to quit before she succeeded in playing the song even once with the proper form, because it was her bedtime. When I told her we would have to finish the day’s practice the next day (today), she again began wailing. I expressed sympathy, said that she couldn’t change it, and sent her up for bed.

So that’s where we are today: I’m encouraged by M’s progress in general, and delighted by her ever-more-frequent signs of interest in guitar playing, but I continue to be baffled about how to improve her level of attention to what she is doing. Her problems are not technical, they are mental, and it is difficult to know how to make progress. Suzuki teachers would, I think, prescribe listening to the recordings more, but I don’t think that will help much: M has listened to these songs hundreds of times and knows how they go. She just isn’t applying that knowledge when she plays.

Stay tuned.

Thursday: M has an “out and about” coming up this Saturday, and her group will be playing a lot of old songs that we haven’t been practicing. So this week, we’ve been trying to brush up on our review. Today, I thought we’d start with something easy: Lightly Row.

She played it well to begin with, but in the third section, she forgot a note — instead of playing four 1/4 notes, she played two 1/4 notes and a half note. That is, she played the first section over again, instead of playing the third section. When she finished, I asked if she noticed her mistake, and she said she did not.

So I played the recording and asked her to listen. Then I asked if she noticed her mistake. She said she did not.

I played the recording and asked her to sing along. She sang her incorrect melody on top of the correct melody. She did not notice the mistake.

So I kept playing the recording, variously asking her to sing along on “la” with it and to sing when it was done. She continued to get the melody wrong over and over again. She continued to say that she did not know what she was doing wrong. She got progressively more upset. She said she couldn’t figure it out. I insisted that she could, and must.

After who knows how much of this, she sang along and seemed to get it right, but she was so quiet I couldn’t tell for sure. I asked her if she had done something differently. She wasn’t sure. I asked her to sing by herself; she sang it wrong. I told her that she had just made the same mistake she had been making all night. I told her to remember what she had just sung, then sing along with the recording and try to get it right. I told her that if she got it right, I wanted her to be able to tell me what she had done wrong — that is, to tell me the difference between her mistaken melody and the correct melody.

She sang along, and as she was singing, I could see a light go off: her eyes got wider and she started singing more confidently, and when she got to the third section, she correctly sang the quarter notes. She was then excited to tell me what the difference was between the right version and her erroneous version.

This used up most of our lesson time. We briefly worked on Meadow Minuet, A Toye and Brother John. For Brother John, I asked M to again play one part and then come in singing on the second part. She did pretty well. I was surprised, though, that she reacted very negatively when I suggested she perform Brother John that way. She said that when she had done so in group last week, she had been very embarrassed. She insisted she was too shy to sing in front of a group. This led to a discussion of the meaning of courage: acting in spite of fear.

I wonder how I could have handled the Lightly Row business better. I found it disheartening and amazing that even with the recording playing, M was failing to notice the difference between the melody she heard and the melody she sang.

I think I did the right thing in making her discover the mistake on her own, because it forced her to listen more attentively. But we probably could have gotten there with less grief.

Tuesday: M went back to school yesterday, but the good practice trend of winter vacation has continued. We started practice at 6:30, which is earlier than usual for Tuesday because her Irish-dance class is still on break.

After dinner, we were washing our hands and goofing around a bit. We had this exchange:

Me: What can I do for you now?

M: Tell me that we never have to practice again!

Me: Do you think that’s going to happen?

M: No. I don’t really mean it anyway.

So what at first seemed discouraging (M’s wish to never practice again) turned out to be encouraging.

To start practice, we curled up on the couch and I read Practiceopedia. (I continue to like this way to start our lessons. When time’s short I skip it, but it really is a nice ritual.) Next, I asked M to play all of the Twinkles in a row. (For the Suzuki Association graduation this spring, she has to record them all, though not all in a row.) I tried to egg her on to do it by reminding her that her studio teacher has had only one student ever record them all in a row for a graduation, and I thought she could be the second student.

She did impressively well; it took about six minutes — the longest she has ever played at a stretch. She missed about a note per variation, and every time, it was when she glanced down at me (I was shooting video, at her suggestion). After telling her what a good job she did and how impressed I was that she played them all, I pointed out that her only mistakes (which she pointed out herself as soon as she stopped playing) happened when she looked at me and lost focus on her playing. We will try again. (I may post video or audio from today’s practice some other time.)

Next, we turned to the A section of Carcassi’s Andante. I asked her how many times in a row she thought she could play the A section with no mistakes. She cheerfully volunteered, “Three times. And I know I can do it because that’s how many I did yesterday!” Her first one was fine, then she started missing the G# in the bass at the section’s end, so it took a while to get three in a row. But she did it, without much intervention from me. She was able to see for herself the difference between paying attention and being ready for the G# in the bass (a tough reach, and this song is the first time she’s had  to play it) versus going on autopilot and not being ready for it. After she got three in a row, I asked her, “Do you want to do a fourth one as a bonus?” “Okay,” she said, and proceeded to play it correctly a fourth time.

We finished with the B1/B2 sections of A Toye. She’s been skipping the B2 section, and today, she saw the problem for herself, because when she wasn’t really paying attention to what she was doing, she started into the A section after the B1 section instead of starting on B2. I asked her to play 3 right in a row. It took a while, but she got it. At one point, on what would have been the second in a row, she actually pressed down on an A with her thumb after the last note of the B1 section, which would have been an error had she played it (the A section starts on an A in the bass), but she caught herself and lifted her thumb off of the string before she had played it, then played the right part. I mentioned it to her and pointed out that it showed she was really trying hard to get the notes right, and it also showed that she really needs to work on these two sections, because we are undoing a habit that’s pretty ingrained.

I’m not sure she’s ever been more cooperative. I know we’ll have bad days in the future, but it sure is a nice way to start the year. (Monday was pretty good too.)

Interpersonally, the past ten days or so have gone well (i.e., no real tantrums, pleasant practices). Probably not coincidentally, it’s been M’s winter vacation. Perhaps to improve our practices, I should focus on getting M more sleep!

But the last couple of days have again highlighted M’s weak concentration. Technically she’s doing well; we’ve been working on Carcassi’s Andante, and she can play each section by itself well.

But in our review, I’ve been struck by how unreliable her grasp of form is. For instance, we worked on A Toye the other day, and she botched the structure without knowing she had. The structure, as we describe it, is A1-A2-B1-B2-A1-A1. She, however, played A1-A2-B1-A1-A1-A1 — she skipped B2 entirely and added an extra A1 at the end.

Notably, when she had finished playing and I asked her what form she had just played, she said the correct form. Rather than argue with her, I played back to her a recording of what she had played, and I asked her to write down each section as she heard it. When she did so, she could see that she had played the wrong form. This is what she wrote (she added the description herself; I didn’t ask her to):

Then when she has been playing Twinkle variations the past few days, she’s been getting the form of those wrong! It’s really quite flabbergasting. She will regularly skip the B2 tosto section (i.e., “like a diamond in the sky”), and will not know (or at least will say that she doesn’t know) that she did so.

So I’ve been reminded of how much we need to work on mental practice. If M is genuinely listening to what she is playing, she will not make these kinds of mistakes.

© 2011 Suzuki Dad Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha